Starbucks Faces Backlash for Excluding Unionized Workers from Pay and Benefit Increases
In a move that has sparked controversy and drawn criticism, Starbucks recently announced its plans to increase pay and provide additional benefits for most of its hourly workers in the United States. The decision comes after the coffee giant experienced a year of booming sales and unprecedented success. However, the company’s decision to exclude unionized workers from these perks has raised eyebrows and provoked backlash from labor unions.
Since 2021, a total of 366 Starbucks stores across the country have voted to unionize, reflecting a growing trend among workers seeking better pay, improved working conditions, and job security. Despite this surge in unionization attempts, no labor agreements have been reached between Starbucks and the represented employees.
Starting from January 1, Starbucks plans to raise wages, which currently average $17.50 per hour. Employees who have worked for the company for four years or less will receive raises of either 3% or 4%, while those with a tenure of five years or more will be eligible for a 5% increase. Unfortunately, this 5% raise is considered a new benefit and must be negotiated with the Workers United union, effectively leaving unionized stores deprived of this advantage.
Responding to Starbucks’ decision, the Workers United union intends to file unfair labor practice charges against the company with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The union argues that Starbucks’ choice to withhold benefits from unionized stores is unjust and goes against the principles of fair labor practices.
Further exacerbating the situation, Starbucks has also shortened the time it takes for hourly employees to accrue vacation days, reducing it from one year to 90 days. However, this policy alteration aims exclusively at workers in non-unionized stores, further disadvantaging those employed in unionized locations.
The controversy surrounding Starbucks’ treatment of unionized workers extends beyond pay and benefits. The company recently announced a new North American barista championship, which offers an opportunity for employees in the United States and Canada to showcase their skills. However, this exciting program will not be available to workers at unionized stores, adding to the discontent among the affected employees.
Starbucks’ actions directly contradict a September ruling by an administrative law judge for the NLRB, who deemed the company’s decision to raise pay solely for non-union workers as illegal. In response, Starbucks has appealed the ruling, arguing that the NLRB’s standards do not permit unilateral changes to wages or benefits for unionized workers.
As this contentious issue unfolds, Starbucks finds itself embroiled in a labor dispute that could have significant implications for its reputation and employee relations. The company’s stance on excluding unionized workers from pay increases and additional benefits has attracted scrutiny and raises questions about its commitment to fair treatment in the workplace.
“Infuriatingly humble tv expert. Friendly student. Travel fanatic. Bacon fan. Unable to type with boxing gloves on.”